Sixteen documents, four reference systems, one view
A fictional new-build defects dispute: emails, a customer care log, site notes, a surveyor’s report and warranty letters, each filed its own way. Below is what they add up to, with every line traced back to the passage it came from.
Fictional case · every name, company, address and reference is invented
The case, five ways
The contradictions are the value
Reading these sixteen documents in date order, most people would miss that the developer’s final position rests on a site check two later inspections contradict, or that its own customer care log disproves the date it gives for the first complaint. Lining up what each party said about the same issue makes it visible in seconds.
Hundreds of documents, the same discipline
The real version runs to hundreds of documents and recordings. The work is broken into steps, each checked against a written criterion before the next runs, so the output is something your solicitor or expert can rely on rather than a confident summary. Where your data goes, which tools are used and what is kept is agreed in writing first.
Tell me what you need to show
Tell me roughly how many documents there are and what you need them to prove. I’ll say whether this approach fits before anything is shared. The work is scoped after a first look at the material. How document intelligence works